RootBadger RootBadger
Search
Home › Groups › rb › rb.alt › rb.alt.politics › rb.alt.politics.us › New Iran deal

You followed a reply inside this thread. The full thread is shown below so the parent chain stays intact. Jump to that message.

Thread overview

New Iran deal

Viewing: rb.alt.politics.us Newsgroups: rb.alt.politics.us Started by yodabytz 3 messages 0 useful marks 0 vote points Last activity 4 days ago
Back to group RSS Start new thread
Root message • Message-ID: <798c89de-2c12-4b99-af8c-aed4fc8f586c@rootbadger.com> • 1 line

New Iran deal

yodabytz <yodabytz@holonet.sith>
Message metadata
From: yodabytz <yodabytz@holonet.sith>
Newsgroups: rb.alt.politics.us
Subject: New Iran deal
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2026 16:58:34 -0400
Message-ID: <798c89de-2c12-4b99-af8c-aed4fc8f586c@rootbadger.com>
Organization: The Darkside
X-Info: Open Source Developer since 1997
User-Agent: RootBadger Web
Lines: 1
X-System: RootBadger/1.0 (privacy-protected)

Will this be real? Does Trump even want an actual deal? I think he wants this all to continue until the last minute to be beneficial to the market, gas prices, etc.

--
yodabytz

"Debugging the galaxy, one bite at a time."
1 reply
↩ in reply to yodabytz
Message metadata
From: Lucas <fieldtech@oldiron.dev>
Newsgroups: rb.alt.politics.us
Subject: Re: New Iran deal
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2026 17:30:12 -0400
Message-ID: <904ca7d9-4a45-4772-95db-279863ec9cb3@rootbadger.com>
References: <798c89de-2c12-4b99-af8c-aed4fc8f586c@rootbadger.com>
Followup-To: rb.alt.politics.us
Organization: The Null Device Restoration Society
X-Info: interested in old systems, new mistakes, and anything that still works after being dropped
User-Agent: RootBadger Web
Lines: 5
X-System: RootBadger/1.0 (privacy-protected)

Maybe. I think Trump wants the appearance of a deal more than a clean, boring diplomatic agreement. That does not mean there is no deal to be had, but the incentives are ugly.

Markets like drama as long as they believe somebody has a hand on the wheel. Oil likes uncertainty. Cable news likes the countdown clock. Politicians like looking tough right up until the bill comes due.

The test is pretty simple: does the administration define what Iran actually has to do, what the U.S. gives up in return, and what happens if both sides comply? If the answer stays vague, then it is probably theater with missiles parked behind the curtain.

--
Lucas // still waiting for the future to finish booting
↩ in reply to Lucas · Re: New Iran deal
Message metadata
From: yodabytz <yodabytz@holonet.sith>
Newsgroups: rb.alt.politics.us
Subject: Re: New Iran deal
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2026 11:47:11 -0400
Message-ID: <a34409a0-5856-4b84-a48b-4708212e3225@rootbadger.com>
References: <798c89de-2c12-4b99-af8c-aed4fc8f586c@rootbadger.com> <904ca7d9-4a45-4772-95db-279863ec9cb3@rootbadger.com>
Followup-To: rb.alt.politics.us
Organization: The Darkside
X-Info: Open Source Developer since 1997
User-Agent: RootBadger Web
Lines: 1
X-System: RootBadger/1.0 (privacy-protected)

I actually agree with at least most of that. I think he wants a regime change, but only to weaken the IRGC enough for the people to deal a final blow.

--
yodabytz

"Debugging the galaxy, one bite at a time."
Sign in to reply